One Day (2011) With Trailer

Whenever there's a successful book, an adaptation of the story is never far away. Here we have a faithful adaptation from it's own author (David Nicholls is the writer for the film so no one can argue about what is put on screen). The story, for those of you who haven't read the book, follows the lives of two people, Dexter Mayhew (Jim Stugress) and Emma Morley (Anne Hathaway). What differs from the norm, is the fact we only  meet Dexter and Emma on this "one day" July 15th (St Swithin's Day) every year, for twenty years starting on the night of their  graduation. 

We are shown how their relationship develops over time, from going on holiday together to family bereavement to fall outs and reunions. Sometimes they are together and at other times they are not. Throughout the years they start to grow apart, their lives moving in different directions but their initial connection inevitably always draws them back together. They both experience failed relationships and eventually realise their true feelings for one another and they end up together as fate would have them to be.

I'm sure that many fans of the book would cry outrage at the numerous missing sub plots and minor details but the main emotional ethos of the source material remains intact. There is only so much you can expect to fit into an hour and forty feature film. 

Full praise goes to Rafe Spall as the one time long suffering ex boyfriend of Emma as he steals every scene he is in. The character is bought to life in a better way than I could have ever imagined. The two leads do command the screen well as they go through a range of emotions with events which affect their lives. An obvious talking point will be Hathaways accent. I'm not going to say it's bad but it does veer in and out of  Yorkshire tones. Her Englishness isn't at all terrible but some words do stick out like a sore thumb. It's not a complete mess and does not ruin what is pretty much a very commendable performance.

The use of music to mark the progression of the years is very efficient in allowing viewers to hear as well as see the date on screen via text appearing in an inventive and nifty way. Apart from allowing the actors hair to grow/shorten or go grey, there isn't much the film makers could do to show two people growing older through to their late 30's early 40's.

In some ways the film works as well as the book. The unnecessary flab in the book is trimmed and so are some of the characters which doesn't effect the overall journey of two lead characters. What is lacking I found is the lack of emotional depth that you could get from the book that you couldn't get from the film. The thoughts and feelings can only be portrayed by the two stars but the thoughts are not heard like they are in text. The emotional wallop doesn't translate fully but there are still snatches of tears to be found in the saddest parts of the film.

For the fans of the book, I would have to say not to go in expecting everything you may have read in the novel and you won't be disappointed. The films stays close to the books heart and the journey of Emma and Dexter is brought to life in a worthy adaptation. For those of you who haven't read the book, go out and read it. 

Acting 4/5

Technical Merit 3.5/5

Narrative 4/5

Entertainment 4/5

15.5/20

The Silent House (La Casa Muda) 2010 - Official Trailer

A Uruguayan film which claims to be filmed all in one shot and in real time! I was intrigued to see whether the claims were true. As film making has progressed, what is to stop anyone from making a film in one long continuous shot? Well here's an attempt from debut film maker Gustavo Hernandez.

The plot is based on a true story of an event which happened in the 1940s in Uruguay. A father and daughter are called to a cottage/farmhouse to house sit until it's eventually sale. It doesn't take long to find things are not as quiet and serene as they seem. The daughter Laura, (the main focal point in the film) starts to hear some noise coming from the rooms above. She wakes her father who goes reluctantly to investigate and that's when the film kicks into gear. After a few minutes and the non re-appearance of her father, Laura decides to find out what has happened to her father.

What happens next is a series of what I would call "boo" moments, as the film makers try to catch the viewer off guard by springing up flashes of images and dark shadows in the background to instill some scares. As a veteran horror fan it wasn't too successful as it was predictable. What the film does succeed on though is giving the sense of claustrophobia. Having only one view point can be really unsettling, as the camera follows our protagonist from behind and slowly switching views to being in front and occasionally becoming the POV shot, there is no cut away or a secondary view point. The film makers really have tried to make the film flow like an uncut one long continuous shot.

But is the film really filmed with no cuts? Unforutnately no, those of you with an eagle eye will probably be able to spot the "seemless" cuts between the passing through objects or anything dark. That isn't to say that there isn't a lot of technical achievement on show but the claims of the film are clearly not 100% accurate. There is a lot to say about only having one view point as it can seem really restrictive but in turn it can boost the overall atmosphere and tension. The lack of film score also adds to the sense of dread as every little sound is magnified.

The only thing criticism I would level at the film is it's last reveal or final revelation. When you find out what is really happening there's an enormous sense of let down. For all the films technical flair, the film is severely hampered but it's silly turn in events. If you have seen the French film Haute Tension then you will understand what I am talking about. It should have kept on going as a haunted house story instead of what it turns out to be.

An interesting idea, clever uses of light and dark and the generation of tension is admirable. Clearly influences by other low budget horrors like Blair Witch and the video game Silent Hill. A girl walking around a house with only a torch to light the way only conjours up memories of playing the old survivor horror game. Alas, I feel I would have more fun and rewarding experience playing the game than watching this film. A flawed experiment.

Acting 3/5

Technical Merit 4.5/5

Narrative 2/5

Entertainment 3.5/5

13/20

Before Sunset (2004) with trailer

The second feature in Richard Linklater's exploration at romantic love in which we are re-united with the characters we were first introduced to, back in 1995, in Before Sunrise. Reprising their respective roles are Ethan Hawke (Jesse) and Julie Delpy (Celine). We are invited to catch up on their lives 9 years later and straight away we feel like we're catching up with old friends.

For those of you who have not seen the first feature, at the end of that film, both promised to meet each 6 months later but the meeting never took place. Almost a decade later we find Jesse (an author now,who's written a book based on his experiences in Vienna) on the launch of his book in a bookstore in Paris. The film opens up with Jesse explaining his theory and his ideas of his own book. By coincidence Celine happens to be in the very same book store. What follows is a brief encounter where they go to have coffee and converse over matters and topics like their lives and the reasoning why they never got to meet up.

As they wander through the streets of Paris they talk about what had happened, the camera slowly follows them as they talk and catch up on events. This one, like the previous effort, the dialogue and performance is main focal point and drive in the narrative. Issues which both character have passions for, are vocal discussed in an expressive and devoted manner like the environment. In the little time Jesse has before he his flight leaves, they connect like they did before as they come to realise that this sort of connection is a rare thing in life. The way in which they talk is so relaxed and comfortable in feels so effortless and never contrived.

With this film being set almost a decade later it differs from the fact they have moved on and their lives have changed but they realise that there is some chemistry and undeniable attraction towards each other. Gone are the ideals of young love and blossoming relationship, here we see two people reconnecting and finding nothing has changed in what they found so attractive about each other.

What is technical, a remarkable achievement, is the way the film unfolds in very long shots which captures the naturalist and authentic performances in the streets of Paris. The dialogue is as ever, free flowing, witty, entertaining, funny and never feels like they're reading from a script. The writing duties on this film is credited to both leads (and director) which shows their acting never feels like acting, past experiences and events in their real lives seem interwoven into the story. With the ever setting sunset, the film captures an illuminating yellow tint which gives the overall tone and feel a glowing radiant beautiful shine. It  feels like a metaphor on their relationship. The sun maybe setting  but there is a beautiful glow like the heart beating on and love still resonating.

A journey which unfolds in real time and with two likable actors who portray two people in a very honest and romantic way in picturesque setting of Paris. Little nuances from unspoken words to glances and physical touches all adds to the depth of realism. And in the way in which the film ends, well... maybe there's more to their relationship to discover and more to their journey but when it ends, we left with "what ifs" and "what now". A tantalising ending, full of promise and hope.

Acting 5/5

Technical Merit 4.5/5

Narrative 4.5/5

Entertainment 4.5/5

18.5/20